From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,124905131f269735 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-25 13:47:11 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-04!supernews.com!feed.textport.net!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Ted Dennison References: <1001442590.557811@news.drenet.dnd.ca> Subject: Re: gnat and heap size Message-ID: <%26s7.4950$ev2.8194@www.newsranger.com> X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 16:46:51 EDT Organization: http://www.newsranger.com Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 20:46:51 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13362 Date: 2001-09-25T20:46:51+00:00 List-Id: In article <1001442590.557811@news.drenet.dnd.ca>, Claude Marinier says... >We want to use large arrays (well, large for us: 10000 x 10000 complex >numbers). We are using gnat 3.13p on Solaris 7. We run out of heap (heap >exhausted) and have not yet found a way to increase it. By my math, that's probably going to be using at least 800MB. Do you actually have that much RAM in your system? It would have to be one kick'n system to have nearly a gig of contiguous free RAM available on the heap... --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com