From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ba6be085b324b8cd,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-02-07 04:08:16 PST Path: swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!jussieu.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!pasteur.fr!news2.EUnet.fr!enst!enst!not-for-mail From: Samuel Tardieu Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Working emacs-ada-mode ? Date: 7 Feb 1995 12:55:24 +0100 Organization: Ecole Nationale Superieure des Telecommunications Sender: tardieu@enst.fr Distribution: world Message-ID: <"bGOtp1.0.c.h-rDl"@valjean> Reply-To: sam@inf.enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Host: valjean.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: special-delivery X-WWW: http://autan.enst.fr/~tardieu/ X-PGP-key: finger -l tardieu@autan.enst.fr X-Mail-Processing: Sam's procmail tools Date: 1995-02-07T12:55:24+01:00 List-Id: Is there a Ada95 compliant emacs ada-mode ? In the one I use (2.12), I have some trouble with protected variables declarations which are not indented correctly, as well as with barriers for protected entries. Does anyone have a modified ada-mode which would work with these ? Sam -- "La cervelle des petits enfants, ca doit avoir comme un petit gout de noisette" Charles Baudelaire