From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f822ae7b0f7433c1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!209.244.4.230!newsfeed1.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Translating an embedded C algorithm Date: 20 Jan 2007 17:53:29 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: <$1FzjCNVEKYv@eisner.encompasserve.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1169337103 22336 192.135.80.34 (20 Jan 2007 23:51:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:51:43 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8378 Date: 2007-01-20T17:53:29-06:00 List-Id: In article , "Alexander E. Kopilovich" writes: > Larry Kilgallen wrote: >>> Mostly because they are far from determined customers in this case. >> >>I don't believe the company sees their mission as convincing those who >>are not already interested in Ada. I believe they support the trade >>organization (whose name escapes me), but they are not primarily a >>marketing organization. > > Well, I believe that I understand why SofCheck does not want their AdaMagic > Ada-to-C compiler to be used too widely. I also can guess why AdaCore does not > provide similar facility in GNAT. I can see some reasons for Green Hills or > (IBM)Rational for not doing that. > > What I do not understand is - why Aonix does not have it as a feature of their > ObjectAda compiler. I thought Aonix was a customer of SofCheck (or their predecessor), and if so it might be that Aonix does not have the rights to use AdaMagic in that fashion.